Don Fernando
12-23-2008, 04:10 AM
This is another flavored cigar that was send to me by Volt as a joke, he already relieved me from my duties to review it, but I gave him my word and what am I if my word isn’t good enough anymore? The other reviews are here (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=6318), here (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4824) and here (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=3759)
http://i538.photobucket.com/albums/ff347/cs_donfernando/reviews/Phillies%20chocolate/DSC01175.jpg
This is a 5 inch ring 41 cigar with a dark wrapper, nice and clean, but it’s no real tobacco. The wrapper is tobacco paper. There is a little hole in the back so you don’t need to cut the cigar. The aroma is sweet and not recognizable.
http://i538.photobucket.com/albums/ff347/cs_donfernando/reviews/Phillies%20chocolate/DSC01177.jpg
At the predraw I could actually taste some chocolate, but a cheap, bad, chemical chocolate while I like the high quality dark chocolate. After lighting the cigar the chocolate flavor disappears and it’s just a chemical sweetness.
The tobacco paper leaves a strange ash, but the draw, smoke and burn are good. This isn’t a good cigar, no way, but it is not as worse as the Lars Tetens Gorillafinger or the Phillies Peach and White Owl pineapple I smoked before.
http://i538.photobucket.com/albums/ff347/cs_donfernando/reviews/Phillies%20chocolate/DSC01182.jpg
Would I buy this cigar again? A simple NO is the answer to this question.
Construction: 14 / 20
Draw: 12 / 20
Appearance: 8 / 20
Smoke & ash: 7 / 10
Burn: 7 / 20
Aroma (first part) 4 / 10
Aroma (middle part) 4 / 10
Aroma (last part) 4 / 10
http://i538.photobucket.com/albums/ff347/cs_donfernando/reviews/Phillies%20chocolate/DSC01175.jpg
This is a 5 inch ring 41 cigar with a dark wrapper, nice and clean, but it’s no real tobacco. The wrapper is tobacco paper. There is a little hole in the back so you don’t need to cut the cigar. The aroma is sweet and not recognizable.
http://i538.photobucket.com/albums/ff347/cs_donfernando/reviews/Phillies%20chocolate/DSC01177.jpg
At the predraw I could actually taste some chocolate, but a cheap, bad, chemical chocolate while I like the high quality dark chocolate. After lighting the cigar the chocolate flavor disappears and it’s just a chemical sweetness.
The tobacco paper leaves a strange ash, but the draw, smoke and burn are good. This isn’t a good cigar, no way, but it is not as worse as the Lars Tetens Gorillafinger or the Phillies Peach and White Owl pineapple I smoked before.
http://i538.photobucket.com/albums/ff347/cs_donfernando/reviews/Phillies%20chocolate/DSC01182.jpg
Would I buy this cigar again? A simple NO is the answer to this question.
Construction: 14 / 20
Draw: 12 / 20
Appearance: 8 / 20
Smoke & ash: 7 / 10
Burn: 7 / 20
Aroma (first part) 4 / 10
Aroma (middle part) 4 / 10
Aroma (last part) 4 / 10