2012 Fantasy Baseball For Stakes And The Troops

[Mattso3000]

Game was tied until the 11th with RBIs by Ackley and Ichiro in the top.

Tom Wilhemson got the W, Brandon League the S. Ackley also had a solo HR.

This was probably answered earlier but I don't see it...what are we doing with the 40 inning min week one? Site states that if we don't hit 40 innings, we forfeit all pitching categories but there are many teams that only play 3 games week one. The minimum may be tough to hit here.

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by Mattso3000

This was probably answered earlier but I don't see it...what are we doing with the 40 inning min week one? Site states that if we don't hit 40 innings, we forfeit all pitching categories but there are many teams that only play 3 games week one. The minimum may be tough to hit here.

This period goes until April 8th, Matt.

[Mattso3000]

Originally Posted by Stephen

This period goes until April 8th, Matt.

With the exception of Seattle and the Yankees (5 games) and Miami and St. Louis (4 games) all other major league teams play 3 games in the first scoring period. The 40 inning minimum is going to be a problem.

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by Mattso3000

With the exception of Seattle and the Yankees (5 games) and Miami and St. Louis (4 games) all other major league teams play 3 games in the first scoring period. The 40 inning minimum is going to be a problem.

Scott posted this the other day, Matt.

Originally Posted by shilala

There's a minimum number of innings (40) a team has to pitch or they forfeit their wins for the week. I always wondered if that means you'd lose all the stats from your pitchers, and it does not. It's just W's.
A guy could use all closer and middle relief and keep their era and whip down, win saves, and be in real good shape for the week if he didn't even pitch a starter, so I always wondered why that rule is even in place. But it is.

I'd reckon if a team went reliever heavy, they're not too concerned about the Wins category in the first place.

[Mattso3000]

Originally Posted by Stephen

Scott posted this the other day, Matt.

I'd reckon if a team went reliever heavy, they're not too concerned about the Wins category in the first place.

I knew I saw something on this earlier just couldn't find it. Thanks Stephen!