|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Bilge Rat
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Famous Warrior
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Bilge Rat
![]() |
![]()
If a losing bidder were able to wait until "their" item is back in stock, a rain-check if you will, I think that would go a long way toward dispelling any appearance of impropriety.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Famous Warrior
|
![]()
I spoke with the developers. We have not applied that logic to the current version of the site. But it will be considered for future versions. Thanks for the suggestion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Bilge Rat
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Dear Lord, Thank You.
![]() |
![]()
Perhaps change the word "comparable" to "anything at our site"?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Grrrrrr
![]() |
![]()
How is it determined what is comparable? And will multiple comparable items be offered to pick from, or just one? As I hope you realize, what one person thinks is comparable might not be what the next person thinks is comparable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Famous Warrior
|
![]()
Comparisons are offered using several variables. I'm not sure how the algorithms are configured but the models we've used so far are pretty spot on. Currently, there are three options to choose from should the original lot be unavailable for losing bidders. I'm sure users won't be disappointed. If so, I'm just as sure we'll hear about it and repair it in short order.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Grrrrrr
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |