Mother kills intruder with shot gun!!!

[ApexAZ]

The family of the intruder will probably sue her now. In my CCW class, they said that if you need to kill someone in self defense, you should assume you'll need approximately $100,000 for litigation expenses.

Basically, don't kill someone unless you're absolutely certain you have to in order to survive.

[elderboy02]

Originally Posted by ApexAZ

The family of the intruder will probably sue her now. In my CCW class, they said that if you need to kill someone in self defense, you should assume you'll need approximately $100,000 for litigation expenses.

Basically, don't kill someone unless you're absolutely certain you have to in order to survive.

I love Ohio. We have the Castle Doctrine. The scumbags family can't sue you if you shoot them.

[Bill86]

Originally Posted by elderboy02

I love Ohio. We have the Castle Doctrine. The scumbags family can't sue you if you shoot them.

TN too!

IMHO It makes sense. They broke into your house, they should pay the consequences. They understand the risk.

As far as what guns are best for home defense, hell I couldn't tell you. That's why I have a shotgun, 1911 and AR-15. I'll decide should the situation arise.

[Taki]

Originally Posted by ApexAZ

The family of the intruder will probably sue her now. In my CCW class, they said that if you need to kill someone in self defense, you should assume you'll need approximately $100,000 for litigation expenses.

Basically, don't kill someone unless you're absolutely certain you have to in order to survive.

Thats absolutely ridiculous!!! Although very true...