|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Have My Own Room
|
![]()
This thread got me thinking...
We all know that CCs are better for aging because the tobacco is often more fresh, and it's generally accepted that most NCs are made to be smoked right away. In most cases the tobacco used in NCs is already aged to some degree. and from what I understand, Opus Xs are also made from tobacco that is several years aged. so why is it that Opus are generally considered a good candidate for long term aging but other NCs made with aged tobacco are not? I know Opus are full flavored in strength and maybe 5-10 years would mellow them a bit, but it stands to reason that other strong NC cigars made with aged tobacco should also be good candidates for long term aging. right? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ronin smoker
|
![]()
I haven't been at this long enough for any serious aging, but I've noticed two of my go-tos that really improved with a couple of months on them: Perdomo Slow-Aged Lot 826 Maduro and Sancho Panza Double Maduro. The flavors are still there, but they pick up a smoothness that makes them really enjoyable to smoke.
__________________
Cigarette-free since January 2010 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Crazy like a fox
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |