*2009 MLB Thread*

shilala · 10-05-2009, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet

Funny, Chris - as a local guy who's listened to the fans and The Fan for decades now, all that seems vaguely familiar. I heard this last year re the Mets. I heard this the year before re the Mets. I heard this the year before that re the Mets. I've heard this nearly every year, and the only thing that's changed has been the names. I won't say the organization hasn't been trying - they've just not had a great deal of success.

At least they ain't Pittsburgh.

I still love my suckos, but there's an organization that isn't even trying.

The Poet · 10-05-2009, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala

At least they ain't Pittsburgh.

I still love my suckos, but there's an organization that isn't even trying.

I feel for you, Scott. Other "small-market" teams at least try, and a few - like the Twins - do one amazingly fine job. But the Pirates are, well, the Pitts.

MedicCook · 10-05-2009, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala

At least they ain't Pittsburgh.

I still love my suckos, but there's an organization that isn't even trying.

Which is a shame because the Pirates are producing great your players and then giving them away. They need an ownership that is not afraid to spend money in order to make money. Instead they have greedy onwers who take the free money from the Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers & Mets every year and pocket it.

yachties23 · 10-05-2009, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook

Which is a shame because the Pirates are producing great your players and then giving them away. They need an ownership that is not afraid to spend money in order to make money. Instead they have greedy onwers who take the free money from the Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers & Mets every year and pocket it.

Which is why the NFL system > MLB.