Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum  

Go Back   Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum > Non Cigar Specialty Forums > Misc > Sports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2012, 10:39 AM   #321
pektel
I'm nuts for the place
 
pektel's Avatar
1
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
First Name: Peter
Location: Grand Rapids, MN
Posts: 4,320
Trading: (28)
LGC
pektel is just really nicepektel is just really nicepektel is just really nicepektel is just really nicepektel is just really nice
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Will it hinder ticket sales enough to black out games that would normally be televised?

I mean, it's not a big deal to flip the channel on Sunday to check out the game. But entirely another thing to actually visit the venue and watch the debauchery live and in person. To me, it would have an effect on whether or not I buy a ticket, sit in traffic, pay $9 for a beer, etc.
__________________
The problem is not the problem. The problem is your ATTITUDE about the problem.
pektel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 10:59 AM   #322
mosesbotbol
That's a Corgi
 
mosesbotbol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Moses
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,171
Trading: (6)
Punch
mosesbotbol is a jewel in the roughmosesbotbol is a jewel in the roughmosesbotbol is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Why didn't they review the play at a minimum? I'd rather drag the game out than end it with questionable calls.
__________________
Port Wine & Claret | British Cars | Welsh Corgi's
mosesbotbol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:03 AM   #323
icehog3
Admiral Douchebag
 
icehog3's Avatar
15
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Tom
Location: Clermont, Kentucky
Posts: 70,776
Trading: (60)
HUpmann
icehog3 has disabled reputation
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by mosesbotbol View Post
Why didn't they review the play at a minimum? I'd rather drag the game out than end it with questionable calls.
I beilve touchdowns in the finals minutes are automatically reviewed....this one just wasn't reversed.
__________________


Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark!
icehog3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:05 AM   #324
sevans105
Alpha Zombie Wolf "Sceve"
 
sevans105's Avatar
2
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
First Name: Scott
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 1,786
Trading: (30)
Cohiba
sevans105 is a jewel in the roughsevans105 is a jewel in the roughsevans105 is a jewel in the roughsevans105 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Fine me and use the money to pay the regular refs,” Packers guard T.J. Lang

Couldn't have said it better myself.
__________________
sevans105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:07 AM   #325
TJarv
In it to win it
 
TJarv's Avatar
5
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
First Name: Tony
Location: Aubrey, Texas
Posts: 2,027
Trading: (58)
HUpmann
TJarv has a spectacular aura aboutTJarv has a spectacular aura aboutTJarv has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by mosesbotbol View Post
Why didn't they review the play at a minimum? I'd rather drag the game out than end it with questionable calls.
It was reviewed
TJarv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:13 AM   #326
Stephen
Sultan of Cigars
 
Stephen's Avatar
2
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
First Name: Stephen
Location: Where the Pony Express began and Jesse James ended.
Posts: 1,582
Trading: (18)
Stephen has a spectacular aura aboutStephen has a spectacular aura aboutStephen has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehog3 View Post
I beilve touchdowns in the finals minutes are automatically reviewed....this one just wasn't reversed.
Every scoring play is now reviewed, Tom. I know being a Bears fan and all, you don't get to witness this much. But it does happen.
Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:19 AM   #327
shilala
Dear Lord, Thank You.
 
shilala's Avatar
6
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Scott
Posts: 13,721
Trading: (252)
Cuaba
shilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond reputeshilala has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

If it takes the Packers getting screwed every week so that I don't have to hear about Tim Tebow anymore, I'm down.
__________________
shilala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:30 AM   #328
CigarNut
F*ck Cancer!
 
CigarNut's Avatar
16
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
First Name: Michael
Location: Clermont, Florida
Posts: 18,042
Trading: (111)
RA
CigarNut has disabled reputation
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Every scoring play is now reviewed, Tom. I know being a Bears fan and all, you don't get to witness this much. But it does happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shilala View Post
If it takes the Packers getting screwed every week so that I don't have to hear about Tim Tebow anymore, I'm down.
Two great quotes!!

__________________
Need Beads? Need Five Finger Bags?

2 of 3 Requirements for use of the CA Rolodex: 100 posts/ 60 day membership/ participation in trade (trader rating). New members can be added at any time.
CigarNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:31 AM   #329
King James
Regard Me!
 
King James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Jim
Location: Dark Side Of The Moon
Posts: 2,565
Trading: (2)
Bolivar
King James has disabled reputation
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by icehog3 View Post
I beilve touchdowns in the finals minutes are automatically reviewed....this one just wasn't reversed.
From my understanding, it was only reviewed to the extent that both players stayed in bounds and had the ball. A "simultaneous catch" cannot be changed by review, even if the ref was wrong to determine the play last night as a simultaneous catch, the fact that he did means the play cannot be changed.

Granted, I've been busy at school and away from a TV all day, so haven't heard anything else since last night.
__________________
Mob Herfin' Since 2006
King James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:47 AM   #330
Stephen
Sultan of Cigars
 
Stephen's Avatar
2
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
First Name: Stephen
Location: Where the Pony Express began and Jesse James ended.
Posts: 1,582
Trading: (18)
Stephen has a spectacular aura aboutStephen has a spectacular aura aboutStephen has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by King James View Post
From my understanding, it was only reviewed to the extent that both players stayed in bounds and had the ball. A "simultaneous catch" cannot be changed by review, even if the ref was wrong to determine the play last night as a simultaneous catch, the fact that he did means the play cannot be changed.

Granted, I've been busy at school and away from a TV all day, so haven't heard anything else since last night.
NFL's, "official" statement (emphasis mine):

Quote:
In Monday's game between the Green Bay Packers and Seattle Seahawks, Seattle faced a 4th-and-10 from the Green Bay 24 with eight seconds remaining in the game.

Seattle quarterback Russell Wilson threw a pass into the end zone. Several players, including Seattle wide receiver Golden Tate and Green Bay safety M.D. Jennings, jumped into the air in an attempt to catch the ball.

While the ball is in the air, Tate can be seen shoving Green Bay cornerback Sam Shields to the ground. This should have been a penalty for offensive pass interference, which would have ended the game. It was not called and is not reviewable in instant replay.

When the players hit the ground in the end zone, the officials determined that both Tate and Jennings had possession of the ball. Under the rule for simultaneous catch, the ball belongs to Tate, the offensive player. The result of the play was a touchdown.

Replay Official Howard Slavin stopped the game for an instant replay review. The aspects of the play that were reviewable included if the ball hit the ground and who had possession of the ball. In the end zone, a ruling of a simultaneous catch is reviewable. That is not the case in the field of play, only in the end zone.

Referee Wayne Elliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood. The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review.

The result of the game is final.

Applicable rules to the play are as follows:

A player (or players) jumping in the air has not legally gained possession of the ball until he satisfies the elements of a catch listed here.

Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3 of the NFL Rule Book defines a catch:

A forward pass is complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) if a player, who is inbounds:

(a) secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to the ball touching the ground; and

(b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands; and

(c) maintains control of the ball long enough, after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, to enable him to perform any act common to the game (i.e., maintaining control long enough to pitch it, pass it, advance with it, or avoid or ward off an opponent, etc.).

When a player (or players) is going to the ground in the attempt to catch a pass, Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 1 states:

Player Going to the Ground. If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete.

Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 5 states:

Simultaneous Catch. If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers. It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the loose ball.
Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 12:01 PM   #331
OLS
Suck It
 
OLS's Avatar
2
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Brad
Location: TN
Posts: 7,912
Trading: (19)
Bolivar AirForce (Served With Honor)
OLS is a splendid one to beholdOLS is a splendid one to beholdOLS is a splendid one to beholdOLS is a splendid one to beholdOLS is a splendid one to beholdOLS is a splendid one to beholdOLS is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

I sure am glad I am boycotting the entire NFL.
OLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 12:11 PM   #332
TJarv
In it to win it
 
TJarv's Avatar
5
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
First Name: Tony
Location: Aubrey, Texas
Posts: 2,027
Trading: (58)
HUpmann
TJarv has a spectacular aura aboutTJarv has a spectacular aura aboutTJarv has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by OLS View Post
I sure am glad I am boycotting the entire NFL.
If this keeps up I'll join the cause
TJarv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 12:33 PM   #333
mosesbotbol
That's a Corgi
 
mosesbotbol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Moses
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,171
Trading: (6)
Punch
mosesbotbol is a jewel in the roughmosesbotbol is a jewel in the roughmosesbotbol is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Can't wait for the familiar faces of the NFL ref's to come back.
__________________
Port Wine & Claret | British Cars | Welsh Corgi's
mosesbotbol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 12:45 PM   #334
Justinphilly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Of course the NFL made the statement they did. I have to imagine Goodell realizes it was the wrong call, but he HAS to support the replacements. I love Drew Brees' comments, "Ironic that our league punishes those based on conduct detrimental. Whose CONDUCT is DETRIMENTAL now?"
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 01:27 PM   #335
icehog3
Admiral Douchebag
 
icehog3's Avatar
15
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Tom
Location: Clermont, Kentucky
Posts: 70,776
Trading: (60)
HUpmann
icehog3 has disabled reputation
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Every scoring play is now reviewed, Tom. I know being a Bears fan and all, you don't get to witness this much. But it does happen.
Only the defense!

Scott.....psssst.......Tim Tebow.
__________________


Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark!
icehog3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 02:43 PM   #336
IBQTEE1
Crazy K
 
IBQTEE1's Avatar
3
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Kristin
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,563
Trading: (6)
HUpmann
IBQTEE1 has disabled reputation
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Yep the Packers have the ball.

__________________
It's a Good Day to Smoke a Cigar!!!
IBQTEE1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 02:46 PM   #337
icehog3
Admiral Douchebag
 
icehog3's Avatar
15
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Tom
Location: Clermont, Kentucky
Posts: 70,776
Trading: (60)
HUpmann
icehog3 has disabled reputation
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBQTEE1 View Post
Yep the Packers have the ball.

And thanks to the refs, the loss.
__________________


Thanks Dave, Julian, James, Kelly, Peter, Gerry, Dave, Mo, Frank, Týr and Mr. Mark!
icehog3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 03:30 PM   #338
mkarnold1
Skol Vikings!
 
mkarnold1's Avatar
2
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
First Name: Mark
Location: St. Charles, MN
Posts: 1,015
Trading: (22)
RA Army (Served With Honor)
mkarnold1 will become famous soon enoughmkarnold1 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwoodward View Post
Thank you Stephen, that's pretty much the rule I was referring too. I hate it when people cut out parts of rules to try to make their point. Shame on you mkarnold1... that's all I can say.
I was just trying to get a rise out of the packers fans out there. And I did. It is really easy to pick it apart after seeing the play in slow motion and make a big stink about it. The refs on the field do not have that luxury. At regular speed it looked very much like a simultaneous catch, the ref made the call he thought was right based on the information he had at the time and in accordance with the rule as he understood. The reason I did not put the second part of that rule in there, although I did read it, is that the referee on the field was calling the play a simultaneous catch and thus, a TD for the seahawks and at that point in time the next part of the rule is superfluous. After the TD call was made, it is very difficult to overturn because you cannot overturn possession based on instant replay. You know what I hate? When people say "shame on you".
__________________
[Help out the troops!
mkarnold1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 03:45 PM   #339
King James
Regard Me!
 
King James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Jim
Location: Dark Side Of The Moon
Posts: 2,565
Trading: (2)
Bolivar
King James has disabled reputation
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkarnold1 View Post
I was just trying to get a rise out of the packers fans out there. And I did. It is really easy to pick it apart after seeing the play in slow motion and make a big stink about it. The refs on the field do not have that luxury. At regular speed it looked very much like a simultaneous catch, the ref made the call he thought was right based on the information he had at the time and in accordance with the rule as he understood. The reason I did not put the second part of that rule in there, although I did read it, is that the referee on the field was calling the play a simultaneous catch and thus, a TD for the seahawks and at that point in time the next part of the rule is superfluous. After the TD call was made, it is very difficult to overturn because you cannot overturn possession based on instant replay. You know what I hate? When people say "shame on you".
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...s-debacle-too/
__________________
Mob Herfin' Since 2006
King James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 04:18 PM   #340
mkarnold1
Skol Vikings!
 
mkarnold1's Avatar
2
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
First Name: Mark
Location: St. Charles, MN
Posts: 1,015
Trading: (22)
RA Army (Served With Honor)
mkarnold1 will become famous soon enoughmkarnold1 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Packer fan thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by King James View Post
Thanks for posting this article, it makes my point for me. Although Mike Florio makes the completely wrong statement "Make no mistake about it. This one could have been overturned. Rule 15, Section 9 makes the question of whether a pass was “ruled complete/incomplete/intercepted” subject to replay review, with no exception for questions of simultaneous possession."

The fact that no mention is given for simultaneous possession means that it cannot be reviewed, not that it can be. The question of possession is not one that can be reviewed, specifically because it is not on this list of situations that CAN be reviewed.
__________________
[Help out the troops!
mkarnold1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content is copyrighted jointly by Cigar Asylum and the content provider.